In late November 2010, I pitched an idea that was forwarded via email to the editor of Monkeybiz.ca. Are you interested in a review of the latest Keane CD, I asked? She was. So, as requested, I submitted my finished review to one of her co-workers who had begun assisting her earlier that year. The co-worker had become a fan of my work so I figured once all the usual negotiating over edits was concluded (which could sometimes be incredibly annoying), it would be posted tout de suite.
Unfortunately, there would be no further communications for the rest of the year. As the weeks and months ticked by, I thought about firing off another email to find out what the hold-up was. It wasn’t until late June 2011 that I finally did so. Curiously, even after all that time, there was still no response. A month later, the aforementioned editing assistant (who had since become the new editor (but now works for a marketing company)) finally got back to me after another email request for an update.
Deeply apologetic about the delay (she said she had technical difficulties accessing her old work email account), she asked me to re-submit the review to her new email address. About a week after the second submission, I finally got notes and suggestions for my piece. After making some minor revisions and additions, the finished review was finally published on Monkeybiz on July 29, 2011, 8 months after the original pitch.
Despite the long road it took to get to this point, I was generally pretty happy with the posted review. However, for this Published Archives reposting, I’ve made a couple of minor changes. I never felt it was necessary to add the phrase “British techno pioneer” next to Gary Numan’s name (the editor wanted “context” in case readers were unfamiliar with him). It’s now been excised. By the way, if you don’t know who Mr. Numan is, now you do. (The editor also wanted me to add “Beach Boy” to Brian Wilson which I did reluctantly even though I complained that it was completely unnecessary. (“Anyone who knows even basic music history knows who Brian Wilson is,” I wrote to her in an email at the time.) Curiously, “Beach Boy” never did end up in the finished edit.) And “aforementioned” has been restored to paragraph 8. Sounds anal, I know, but welcome to my world.
Keane’s Night Train: An Album Review
Posted on July 29 2011 under Arts & Entertainment
By Dennis Earl
There’s a haunting, familiar elegance about Tom Chaplin’s voice. Even when he’s tormented by lost love or his own broken spirit, he still sounds remarkably pure and comforting. He’s the melancholic son Brian Wilson never knew he had.
Chaplin’s extraordinarily moving vocal style resonates throughout Night Train, the latest entertaining release from Keane, the brilliant British band he’s been leading for more than a decade.
More of a mini-album than a full-length release, this solid follow-up to Perfect Symmetry continues the recent experimental expansion of the band’s original keyboard-bass-drum sound. On Perfect Symmetry, they added a lead guitar. On this one, we get brief yet welcome forays into hip hop and world pop.
With the exception of the pointless yet thankfully short percussive instrumental opener House Lights, which for the most part is forgettable nonsensical chatter backed by experimental noise, the CD never steps wrong.
The synthesizers are front and centre right at the start of Back in Time, a chill-inducing wrencher that wouldn’t be out of place in Gary Numan’s repertoire.
The keyboards are pulled out again for Your Love, a song so electronically retro you’re convinced it was released in 1986, not 2010. Curiously, it’s multi-instrumentalist/producer Tom Rice-Oxley who handles the lead vocals here.
He does a lovely job conveying the undying pain of lost love and the reluctance to leave it in the past. He should sing more often. The strong, meaty lyrics work well with the retro arrangement.
Canadian rapper K’naan provides the aforementioned hip hop element to two songs, both of which deal with the lasting impact of regret.
Stop for a Minute mourns the loss of an important romance due to chronic infidelity. Like Your Love, the protagonist is unable to let go of an essential partner. However, there’s also far more second guessing about the character’s overall decision-making capabilities: “Sometimes I wanna change everything I’ve ever done.”
While not nearly as moving as Back in Time, its reflective, philosophical nature gets to you in a deeply personal way nonetheless.
The bouncy Looking Back warns of the addictive nature of nostalgia and how it interferes with the joys of daily living: “Don’t waste your time just looking back.” Recreating part of the Rocky theme song as its basic hook, Chaplin’s soothing vocals are insistent on closure as he persuasively urges a reconnection to the present.
An acoustic guitar is brought out for the lovely Clear Skies. Accented by handclaps amidst a Spanish atmosphere, it reminded me a bit of U2’s When I Look at the World.
To alleviate the heavy nature of Night Train, Keane offers an unexpected, disco-flavoured cover. Japanese trio Yellow Magic Orchestra originally wrote and recorded Ishin Denshin back in 1983.
For the reworking, Keane harmonizes in English on every chorus while guest vocalist Tigarah handles the verses in Japanese. Her low-key singing never overpowers you, which is quite the contrast from Chaplin’s creamy vocals on other songs, but it suits the piece just the same.
Even though Ishin Denshin sounds more like a potential B-side than a necessary inclusion here, it’s unlike anything else in their catalogue. Think of it as a catchy throwaway and nothing more.
The closer, My Shadow, on the other hand, is vintage Keane with its instantly distinguishable keyboard sound and heartfelt, yearning lyrics. The song is so cinematic with its emotional sweep it wouldn’t have been out of place in a John Hughes movie. Come to think of it, much of this record has that feel about it.
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, September 22, 2013
11:46 p.m.
8 Reasons Pope Francis Isn’t A Liberal Reformer
Ever since he replaced the despicable Benedict XVI as the head of the Vatican back in March, Pope Francis has been the toast of the media. Reporters, pundits, even comedians have sung his praises. Why, exactly? Well, mainly it’s because of some of the positive things he’s been saying lately.
Things like “I’m a sinner” and “If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?” and “The Lord has redeemed all of us, all of us, with the Blood of Christ: all of us, not just Catholics. Everyone! ‘Father, the atheists?’ Even the atheists. Everyone!”. But as the old saying goes, talk is cheap. The new Pope can claim to be a more open-minded pontiff all he wants. The truth of the matter is this 76-year-old man with more than 40 years experience working within the stubbornly conservative Catholic Church is no liberal reformer. Here are 8 reasons why:
1. He’s against gay marriage.
Back when he was the Archbishop of Buenos Aires in his native Argentina, the former Jorge Bergoglio often butted heads with the government. In 2010, as legislators were debating the idea of legalizing same-sex marriage, Mr. Enlightened had this to say about it:
“In the coming weeks, the Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family…At stake is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother and children. At stake are the lives of many children who will be discriminated against in advance, and deprived of their human development given by a father and a mother and willed by God. At stake is the total rejection of God’s law engraved in our hearts.
“Let us not be naive: this is not simply a political struggle, but it is an attempt to destroy God’s plan. It is not just a bill (a mere instrument) but a ‘move’ of the father of lies [aka the devil] who seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God.”
“I invoke the Lord to send his Spirit on senators who will be voting, that they do not act in error or out of expediency, but according to what the natural law and the law of God shows them…We remember what God said to his people in a moment of great anguish: ‘This war is not yours, but God’s’: defend us, then, in this war of God.”
Bergoglio’s ignorant, paranoid comments (not to mention his desperate prayer) fell on deaf ears. Argentina became the first Latin American country to officially recognize same-sex marriages that same year. And for the record, no heterosexual families have been negatively affected by it.
2. He’s against abortion.
As the new Pope, he thinks the Vatican “obsesses” too much about this legal medical procedure. But that hasn’t stopped him recently from condemning it outright:
“Each child who is unborn, but is unjustly condemned to be aborted, bears the face of Jesus Christ, bears the face of the Lord, who, even before he was born, and then as soon as he was born, experienced the rejection of the world.”
Actually, each child has the face of their parents but I digress.
Francis has also referred to abortion as an evil product of “throw-away culture” and believes that “not…allow[ing] the further development of a being which already has all the genetic code of a human being is not ethical. The right to life is the first among human rights. To abort a child is to kill someone who cannot defend himself.”
Tell that to the 40000 rape victims who get pregnant every year. I mean is it so terrible to not want to bring into the world a living reminder of your trauma? According to Mr. Open-Minded, it is.
3. He’s against gay sex.
Many have cheered his “who am I to judge?” remark regarding the LGBT community but he does not support their sexuality. He didn’t invent the old love-the-sinner/hate-the-sin routine, but he firmly believes in it nonetheless. To put it bluntly, he supports gay people but not when they fuck other gay people. Yeah, that’s not having it both ways at all.
4. He favours the current rules on celibacy.
Last year, Archbishop Bergoglio made this remark in a book called On The Heavens And The Earth:
“For the moment, I am in favor of maintaining celibacy, with all its pros and cons, because we have ten centuries of good experiences rather than failures. What happens is that the scandals have an immediate impact. Tradition has weight and validity.”
In that same publication, he maintains that those who are sexual have to choose between having a love life and being a devout priest. In his eyes, and that of the Catholic Church, they cannot have both:
“It’s a matter of one choosing again or saying, ‘No, what I’m feeling is very beautiful. I am afraid I won’t be faithful to my commitment later on, so I’m leaving the seminary.’ When something like this happens to a seminarian, I help him go in peace to be a good Christian and not a bad priest.”
Unlike Muslim imams, Jewish rabbis and Christian ministers, Catholic priests can’t be dads and husbands simultaneously:
“If one of them comes and tells me that he got a woman pregnant, I listen. I try to help him have peace and little by little I try to help him realize that the natural law takes priority over his priesthood. So, he has to leave the ministry and should take care of that child, even if he chooses not to marry that woman. For just as that child has the right to have a mother, he has a right to the face of a father. I commit myself to arranging all the paperwork for him in Rome, but he has to leave everything.”
Make no mistake about it. Priests will remain forbidden to marry under his papacy. As Francis put it in 2012, “For now, the discipline of celibacy stands firm.”
5. He’s against allowing women to become priests.
In his long recent interview with America Magazine, a Catholic publication, the pontiff was asked about the role of women in the church. This is how he started:
“I am wary of a solution that can be reduced to a kind of ‘female machismo,’ because a woman has a different make-up than a man. But what I hear about the role of women is often inspired by an ideology of machismo.”
How very liberating, Francis. This past July, he revealed just how inclusive he truly is:
“As far as the ordination of women, the Church has already spoken out and the answer is no. John Paul II made the Church’s stance definitive. The door is closed.”
Way to make the ladies swoon.
6. He’s against contraception.
It’s hard to imagine anyone in 2013 still being against birth control of any kind but Pope Francis is one of the remaining holdouts.
7. He’s against gay couples adopting children.
He considers it “discrimination”. GLAAD is so proud.
8. He’s against dissent.
Despite claiming recently that’s he’s not a stickler for Catholic doctrine, he’s a stickler for Catholic doctrine. Consider the story of Greg Reynolds. The Australian priest supports ordaining women and is pro-gay. You know what that means. You guessed it. He’s been kicked out of the church.
So, the next time someone tries to convince you that Pope Francis is a man of change, feel free to refer to this list.
You’re welcome.
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
12:17 a.m.