I have this test for a certain kind of actor. If you can make me forget you’re an asshole in real life for two hours, then I have to admit you’re scary good at your job.
For a long time, Mel Gibson passed this test. A raging xenophobe & homophobe and a violent misogynist off-screen, he could turn on the charm rather easily on-screen. It helps explain why he got away with being a terrifying abuser for so long.
Take his role in Bird On A Wire, for instance. In the film, he plays a paranoid pacifist hiding in plain sight through the FBI’s witness relocation program. 15 years ago, while seeking Acapulco Gold with a pal in Mexicali, he got entangled with a couple of crooked federal drug agents. They roped them into doing a major drug deal which went horribly wrong. One of the narcs (David Carradine) killed his friend and a federal agent. After three months in jail, Gibson testified against him and he’s been moving around the country with different names and accents ever since. (Apparently, he briefly ran Columbia Pictures, a funny inside joke.)
When we first meet him, he’s a bored, isolated, prank-lovin’, pony-tailed Southern mechanic in a Detroit gas station. One rainy night, his past begins to catch up with him. A customer in a BMW pulls up and the minute they lock eyes, he knows his cover’s been blown.
Goldie Hawn, a high-powered corporate attorney, is the driver. Thinking they were on the verge of marriage 15 years ago, she was led to believe he died in a plane crash. She even went to his memorial service. When confronted, Gibson plays dumb, pretending he doesn’t have a tattoo and he’s a Vietnam vet. Hawn knows better.
In a panic, Gibson tries to re-connect with the FBI agent who has overseen his case. But he’s retired now and, as it turns out, rather senile. So, he’s put in touch with Stephen Tobolowsky, the worst possible guy he could talk to.
Shortly thereafter, a now paroled David Carradine (yeah, that’s believable) and an indicted Bill Duke (who escaped during the ill-fated drug deal debacle) pay him an unexpected visit. (They need to eliminate him so they can get back to smuggling.) But because Carradine is gabby, Gibson survives with only butt pain, thanks to Hawn’s impeccably timed return. (Hesitant villains with bad aim are the lamest villains of all.)
For the rest of the movie, the formerly devoted couple alternate between bickering, laughing, running, driving, flying, starving, ogling and, inevitably, screwing, all while continually tipping off their whereabouts and yet implausibly avoiding serious calamity. (Gibson gets shot three times but never in a dangerous area.) Hawn is pissed about being kept in the dark all this time but, even though she has a new boyfriend, she never got over Gibson. Despite having a fling with a gun-totin’ veternarian (Joan Severence in one of her better performances), he feels exactly the same about Hawn.
It’s a delicate balancing act trying to make a funny action film, let alone one with a dickhead leading man, and Bird On A Wire can’t pull it off. The chase sequences mostly lack genuine excitement and consistent comic ingenuity. There’s a really funny moment, though, when Gibson makes a cheeky observation about Hawn as they’re climbing up a ladder, but that’s a rarity. Most of the gags just don’t work.
Gibson and Hawn have such an easy, natural chemistry that when they argue, to a certain extent it feels a bit phony. Shouldn’t she be more relieved than angry he’s still alive? And even though he’s an old-school hippie who still sings Dylan at the top of his lungs and she’s now a loaded capitalist stuck in a dead-end relationship with some overworked nerd, their oppositional tension isn’t believable, I don’t care how many times she mumbles. When they spend the night in a crummy motel (which inspires a couple of laughs), all it takes is a dick joke and one night of intimacy to make Hawn let go of her mostly contrived grievances.
All the while, Carradine, Duke and Tobolowsky continue to stalk them until the expected final confrontation. After finally reconnecting with the now-retired FBI agent, Gibson and Hawn are advised to make their way to a nearby zoo. Gibson used to work here during a past identity and he’s expecting to find a cache of weapons in the control room. Good thing he knows how to unlock cages.
I first watched Bird On A Wire on my 15th birthday during its 1990 theatrical run. I kinda liked it (I still love The Neville Brothers’ catchy Leonard Cohen cover) and was blissfully unaware of Gibson’s real-life dark side. Now in my early 40s (and knowing a lot more about his general awfulness), I understand today why critics were not as enamoured.
There aren’t many surprises here except maybe the denseness of the heroes. As paranoid as Gibson is in the film, he’s not very smart. After being wrongly accused of murder early on, he doesn’t exactly keep a low profile. In fact, he doesn’t change his appearance at all. Plus, he drags Hawn to some of his former stomping grounds. Tobolowsky and company correctly anticipate his next moves because they know all his former identities, and it takes him forever to finally realize that. Hawn isn’t much help to his cause. At one point, she makes it worse.
Even though Gibson is far from truly hateful in the film (he’s more of a reckless, harmless goof than anything else), he does offer an unnecessary impression of a sissy hairdresser, a tired stereotype. I have to admit that when he gets beaten up and shot at, I wasn’t terribly upset, even though his character is more principled than the actor who plays him.
There’s an unwritten rule in Hollywood that assholes are often cast as heroes and actual gentlemen play the nastiest villains. There are exceptions, of course, but not in the case of Mel Gibson. If Bird On A Wire had been a lot funnier and smarter, the charm con that he long specialized in would’ve prevailed once more.
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, April 30, 2017
6:40 p.m.
Revealing Quotes From Bill O’Reilly’s Keep It Pithy (Part Two)
“…Hillary Rodham Clinton wrote that ‘it takes a village’ to raise children. My parents and their friends thought it takes parents. They were sorry that some of my friends had maniacs for parents, but they didn’t interfere. And they didn’t want anyone poking their nose in our house, either.” (SEVEN, pg. 76)
“…can I say that my father was always looking out for me? No, I can’t…my father had demons that intruded on his parental duties…my father set a terrible example by inflicting unnecessary pain on his children. He did not do this on purpose. He simply could not control himself.” (SEVEN, pg. 77)
“…these kids have been taught one lesson very well in their twelve years of so-called schooling: They are not going to be held accountable for failure. When you have a lot of people believing that, you’re in real trouble.” (SEVEN, pg. 78)
“NAMBLA’s website, as of this writing, is still up and running.
You don’t want to go there, I’m guessing.” (SEVEN, pg. 80)
[from O’Reilly’s Ten Commandments of Effective Parenting, first seen in Who’s Looking Out For You?]
“3. Parents who are looking out for their children will be under control in the house. There will be no random violence, intoxication, sexual displays, uncontrolled anger, or vile language…If it is a chaotic mess, the parents are not looking out for the kids.
[snip]
7. Rules will be enforced but explained. Parents who truly look out for their kids understand that there are rules in society and that high standards of behaviour are the key to a successful life. Rules are good. But rules must have a logical objective…
8. Parents will be honest at all times. Lead by example. No lying, no cheating, no nasty gossip, no cruelty, no manipulating…”
9. Parents will be respectful of their parents. Grandparent abuse or neglect is among the worst possible things a child can see. This is a very important commandment. You can’t effectively look out for your kids if you don’t look out for your folks. (Even if they don’t deserve it.)” (SEVEN, pgs. 81-4)
[from O’Reilly’s lame, satirical “secular Ten Commandments”]
“ONE: Thou Shalt Not Make Any Judgment Regarding Most Private Personal Behaviour. Man/Woman Is the Master/Mistress of the Universe and His/Her Gratification Is Paramount.” (EIGHT, pg. 89)
“Thanks to increased competition, you are now much more likely to hear all sides of a story. Sometimes that’s more information and more scandal than you might want to hear, but it’s your right and your job as a citizen to face up to it.” (EIGHT, pg. 90)
“The reason that we wretches [journalists] are under so much suspicion is that we are perceived as being arrogant. That charge is tossed my way often. I’ll let you make the call.” (EIGHT, pg. 91)
“We have an obligation to report on school principals like the one in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, who refused to publicly discipline two students who engaged in oral sex on a school bus in full view of other young students. I mean, what kind of message does an educator send when he believes disgraceful public conduct is a private matter?
The fourteen-year-old girl and the sixteen-year-old boy who humiliated themselves and corrupted other children most likely got their oral sex education from the entertainment media (or President Clinton). We have an obligation to scrutinize show business and so-called ‘celebrities’ who behave disgracefully. We have an obligation to hold the corrupters personally accountable.
But we are not doing it. And because of this cowardice and apathy, the forces of darkness are allowed to go to the bank unchallenged and, at times, even glorified.” (EIGHT, pg. 91)
“You will rarely see an article written about me that does not describe me as ‘contentious,’ ‘bombastic’, ‘a blowhard,’ or ‘bullying.’ While that assessment may be accurate… (EIGHT, pg. 92)
“…you can go ahead and hose people all day long, amassing great wealth and power, but what, exactly, does that mean? Nada, that’s what. Note to the greed-heads and evildoers: You may be remembered for your misdeeds, but only as objects of ridicule or revulsion.” (EIGHT, pg. 93)
“…most bad people, out of cowardice or self-interest, attempt to disguise their evil. Some get justice, but some do not. For me, that’s the most frustrating part of life: seeing evil individuals continue to harm people with impunity.” (EIGHT, pg. 94)
“Sex is supposed to be a private activity between consenting adults who are honest with each other, sharing pleasure and affection, and then shut up afterward.
Men, if a woman shares her body, take it as a gift of affection, not proof that you’re stud of the month.
Ladies, if you said yes without being forced, then don’t brag to your coworkers or your homegals.” (NINE, pg. 98)
“Dykes on Bikes? Take a hike! Can’t you ‘express yourself’ without throwing it in our faces?
…I don’t want to have to try to explain why Jack is dressed up like Jill or Jill is wearing a buzz cut. The kid shouldn’t have to be dealing with any sexual ideas at all, much less a couple of thousand folks marching around in drag or half-naked in order to ‘celebrate your sexuality.’ Give us all a break. Express your sexuality where the rest of us do, if we have any sense: at home, with the blinds drawn.” (NINE, pg. 99)
“Like Ann Landers, I’ve come up with a little manual for dealing with the opposite sex…Bring on the cheek-to-cheek, the heavy petting, and the home runs, but not ever with any of the following prohibited, ridiculous lines:
He says,
[snip]
‘Look, I just want to talk to you. Nothing will happen if I come in.’ Lock the door.
[snip]
She says,
‘Let’s be friends.’ Fine. Date her best friend.
‘My sister’s got two beautiful kids.’ Whatever you do, do not have sex with this woman.
‘I’m not that kind of girl.’ Get the telephone number of her best friend right now.” (NINE, pgs. 103-4)
“I don’t tolerate victimizers or charlatans or liars or manipulators.” (NINE, pg. 109)
“…I have instituted the two-call rule…If I call a person twice and don’t receive a call back, that relationship is over. I leave a short message saying that I will not be calling again.
[snip]
“I want to deal only with people who are respectful of others, even in a casual setting such as a restaurant. Be aware of how others are treating you and question that treatment if you feel it isn’t square.” (NINE, pg. 110)
“If you have to convince someone to be your friend, the concept of friendship falls apart. Like love, you can’t force it.” (NINE, pg. 111)
“In my early years, I had no idea that I would rise so high in my career; nor did my friends. They were betting on the penitentiary.” (NINE, pg. 111)
“For people like me…disaster is always in play, constantly present on the horizon…both my mother and father were possessed by a nagging fear that stuff would inevitably go wrong.
“..Americans born into wealth and power usually do not have that fear. That’s because things always seem to work out for them. Money buys security from harm and often can mitigate difficult situations. Power, as we’ve discussed, leads to opportunities.” (TEN, pg. 118)
“Ms. [Rosie] O’Donnell demonizes anyone she disagrees with, and her musings are not to be questioned.” (TEN, pg. 119)
“Burt [Reynolds] took full advantage of Dallas [in 1977 while shooting Semi-Tough] with hot and cold running babes in his hotel suite and fleets of limos…I kind of liked him…But even I had enough smarts to see that he was headed for a fall. He was too cocky to the wrong people…” (TEN, pg. 123)
“What kind of power does Oprah wield? Well, Parade magazine reports that she makes $260 million a year.
[snip]
Having that kind of money can literally drive a person crazy.
[snip]
With everything almost instantly available, everything becomes rather ordinary. For that reason, the ultrawealthy, if they are not ultracareful, can become bored, jaded, or, even worse, sadistic or self-destructive. The awful behaviour of some celebrities and power brokers illustrates that point beyond a reasonable doubt. Just ask Caligula.” (TEN, pg. 127)
“I know that sometimes I come off as ‘all about me.'” (ELEVEN, pg. 142)
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, April 23, 2017
2:42 a.m.