Time to play a new game. Let’s call it: Who Has It The Worst? Our first contestant is a middle-aged man who wears a human mask sewn right into his face. He has the mentality of an 8-year-old, lives all alone in his family’s basement and enjoys slicing off human body parts with his trusty collection of chainsaws. (A cannibal’s gotta eat, you know?) Give it up for Jedidiah, everybody!
Now let’s meet our second contestant. She’s an aspiring artist in her 20s who cuts and packages meat at her local grocery store where she works with a girlfriend, a cashier, who is secretly fucking her live-in boyfriend, a fighter. Her parents can’t stand her and the feeling is mutual. Let’s hear it for Heather!
Little do either of them know, they’re about to meet for the first time in Texas Chainsaw, the more-disturbing-than-scary seventh installment in this longtime horror series. Pretending that there never was a sequel to the 1974 original, the film continues the story by slyly incorporating new scenes set in the same time period to match quick flashbacks from its influential predecessor.
After we witness Jedidiah kill a number of innocent people (and watch his family torment a woman who eventually escapes), the Sheriff of this small Texas town (Thom Barry, one of the standout supporting players here) tracks down his entire family of cannibals at their farm house (a carefully replicated version of the original set (both inside and out) from the first film) where he demands the surrender of the first silent, masked, homicidal maniac in movie history.
The family initially refuses. But as they reconsider honouring the request, a band of local yokels, led by Bible-thumping Burt (the terrifically villainous Paul Rae), arrive and they’re not exactly the patient types. Completely ignoring the pleas of the sensible Sheriff Hooper, they launch an unprovoked attack on the entire household. (Think gun shots and Molotov cocktails.) Later that night, in a makeshift garage away from the utterly decimated crime scene, one of the hicks discovers a terrified woman with her baby. Knowing that his wife wants one of her own but can’t conceive, he kicks the poor woman and takes away her pride and joy. She’s the last Sawyer to die in the aftermath of the original massacre. Despite damning written testimony by Hooper, no one goes to jail for willfully participating.
A couple of decades later, a fully grown Heather (the beguiling Alexandra Daddario) learns she was that baby. She also learns that the grandmother she never knew has just died and bequeathed her large mansion to her among other assets we never learn about. Already planning to go to New Orleans to celebrate Halloween with her unfaithful boyfriend, Ryan (musician Trey Songz), her two-timing gal pal/co-worker, Nikki (sexy Tania Raymonde), and her new guy, Kenny (Keram Malicki-Sanchez), a would-be chef old high school friend Ryan fixed her up with, they all agree to check out the mansion in Newt, Texas along the way.
During a junk food pit stop, Ryan appears to have hit an innocent hitchhiker (Shaun Sipos) with his van. The stranger convinces everybody inside through his convenient tale of woe to take him along. Once they arrive at the mansion gate, Heather’s lawyer, Mr. Farnsworth (played by reliable character actor Richard Riehle), gives them all the lowdown on her newly acquired property. He also specifically requests more than once that she read a letter her grandmother wrote to her shortly before her death. The fact that she doesn’t do this until the end of the movie reveals the overall lack of intelligence we’re dealing with here.
Also dumb is how the foursome allow Darryl, the aforementioned too-good-to-be-true hitchhiker, to stay behind while they go into town to buy groceries for the next couple of days. (The gang decide to spend the night in Newt because the mansion is “insane”, you see. Example: it has a pool table!) Trusting a guy they barely know to watch the place while they’re gone for a bit leads to the discovery that he’s a thief. (How shocking.) Thanks to his greedy ways, he stumbles upon a secret entranceway and a staircase that leads to the basement where he hopes to find more treasure.
After grumbling about all the old bottles of wine he finds in one room, he spots an empty dinner tray on the floor right in front of a sliding steel door. Trying desperately to open it, he encounters the mansion’s big secret. You guessed it, Jedidiah, who promptly offs him, an event that goes completely unnoticed for quite some time by the returning couples. He was that missed. (However, there’s a funny moment when the gang return and express admiration for his “smooth” con job.)
Later that night, old Leatherface wacks another curious member of the group (also unnoticed for a time) and introduces himself in his own unique way to the exploring Heather, the surviving cousin he’s never met as an adult. (Should’ve read Granny’s letter, miss thang. Speaking of the old lady, her body is still in the house. What’s that about?) She barely escapes the property with Ryan and Nikki (who unintentionally save her by drawing attention to themselves after their literal romp in the hay is interrupted), albeit temporarily. Thanks to the chainsaw wonder, their car flips over and Heather is the only one who manages to get away.
With the relentless Jedidiah hot on her trail, she runs frantically through a carnival until she’s rescued by Carl (Scott Eastwood; yes, Clint’s son), another character our sad sack hero is wrong to trust.
As I mentioned before, Texas Chainsaw is the seventh Massacre movie in a franchise that has now entered its fifth decade. It is by no means a good movie. There are only two genuinely effective thrills. One involves a chainsaw toss, the other a freaky painting. Although it continues the unchecked depravity and gore that ran rampant in the two most recent entries in this series (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre remake and its subsequent prequel, The Beginning, both unpleasant experiences no one should ever suffer through), it at least tries to be a little different, just not very successfully.
When Leatherface finds himself on the receiving end of a redneck double team late in the third act, if this were a professional wrestling angle, ideally, the fans would start cheering for his comeback. Unfortunately, I didn’t. Sure enough, his terrified cousin (who is deeply relieved she has that family birthmark he eventually sees and recognizes) forms an uncomfortable, belated alliance with him despite what he did to her friends earlier on. I’ve seen some awkward babyface turns in wrestling before but this one takes the prize. No wonder it’s not terribly persuasive.
But back to our game. I ask again, Who Has It The Worst? Is it the friendless, orphaned psychotic freak who lives in a dank, windowless basement, can’t stop killing people and is never seen without his human face mask? Or the overly naïve young woman with the haunting eyes, no good options remaining at the conclusion of this film and who’s roped into taking care of him?
Call it a draw.
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
1:16 a.m.
Questions For Sophia Bush
1. Considering your absolute lack of interest in holding your hero President Obama accountable for his numerous human rights violations, wouldn’t it make more sense for you to host the Do Nothing Awards?
2. Will you ever apologize for falsely claiming that disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong, who you still follow on Twitter, was the subject of an unwarranted “witch hunt”?
3. If you care so much about the environment, why aren’t you raising hell over Obama’s plans to drill in the melting Arctic?
4. Why do you lecture people about name calling on Twitter when you do it yourself? If you can’t live up to your own standard, why maintain that standard in the first place?
5. When Obama orders drone strikes that kill innocent children, teenagers, men, women and expectant mothers in Middle Eastern countries, how can you stay silent? Where is your outrage?
6. Is it fair to say that the only human rights violations you don’t care about are the ones President Obama is responsible for?
7. Although you have linked to two articles that praise American whistleblowers on Twitter, why no personal comments of support for Bradley Manning, John Kiriakou, Barrett Brown and Edward Snowden?
8. Do you regret totally accepting the federal government’s initial story regarding the 2011 assassination of Osama Bin Laden without any skepticism when major elements turned out to be false or, at the very least, disputed?
9. Specifically referencing Joseph Kony’s alleged war crimes, you once tweeted: “If we allow this to happen, we are complicit, and thus guilty. We cannot turn a blind eye to this horror.” So, because you’ve turned a blind eye to President Obama’s proven war crimes, does that mean you’re also responsible for the drone murders of thousands of civilians; the torture and humiliation of unlawfully imprisoned, never convicted Gitmo detainees (half of whom have been cleared for release); the indefinite detention of violated Muslims in Bagram; the ruthless prosecutions of honourable whistleblowers, gamblers, journalists, drug users, immigrants, protestors and cancer patients; the increasing militarization of American law enforcement; the racial profiling of Muslims both here and abroad; the immunization of Wall Street as well as telecoms & Internet companies who helped the NSA violate the Fourth Amendment rights and invade the privacy of ordinary citizens worldwide?
10. You sit on the Advisory Board of RYOT.org. Has the website ever reported any important news that didn’t originally come from a more established media source like The Associated Press? Would a potential whistleblower willing to expose malfeasance in the Obama Administration be comfortable with the idea of leaking to your site and would a reporter be willing to cover the story and protect them from inevitable persecution and retaliation?
11. Do you avoid publicly criticizing President Obama because you enjoy visiting him & getting your picture taken with him at The White House? Do you stay quiet because you don’t want to lose that personal access?
12. Don’t you think it hurts your credibility as a human rights activist to not say a word about Obama’s numerous violations of the Constitution and the Geneva Conventions?
13. Martin Luther King once wrote, “The question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists will we be. Will we be extremists for hate or for love?” As a longtime supporter of President Obama, doesn’t that put you in the first category?
14. Speaking of MLK, you retweeted this quote of his: “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” Have you been silent about Obama’s war crimes and constitutional violations because you feel they don’t matter?
15. When you don’t voice your disapproval for Obama’s human rights violations publicly, does that mean you support them secretly?
16. How is that John Cusack is “poignant and brilliant” when he criticizes Obama but when I do it, I “sound like a petulant child” who needs to “grow up”? Can you explain the difference to me because I don’t understand.
17. Speaking of Mr. Cusack, if you admire him so much, why don’t you follow him on Twitter, retweet anything he posts or single him out for praise?
18. You acknowledged the suspicious death of Rolling Stone/BuzzFeed reporter Michael Hastings on Twitter. Considering how adversarial he was with regards to Obama’s foreign policy, why aren’t you as critical of The President?
19. In this tweet, you write: “some of my favourite friends and people on Earth are Muslim.” And in this one: “I don’t put up w/ bullies.” Then, why do you support a President who not only orders the profiling, torturing and killing of innocent Muslims but also threatens countries that refuse to do his bidding? Furthermore, do your friends appreciate your lack of public condemnation for the general mistreatment of Muslims by this administration?
20. You once told Fox News, “I will not vote for a candidate who thinks that he has more rights to my uterus than I do…” And yet, when President Obama tried to enforce age restrictions on Plan B (which he eventually abandoned), you stayed silent. Why?
21. Back in March, you tweeted to me, “…I have seen marginalized people gain rights they didn’t have before since he’s [meaning Obama] been elected.” Which “marginalized people” are you referring to and what new rights have they gained under this administration?
22. You also tweeted to me, “…I have many more discussions with news outlets and friends around my dinner table alike than you will ever know.” Do any of these discussions involve Obama’s numerous human rights and constitutional violations and whether or not you support or condemn said actions?
23. In another tweet you wrote to me: “To criticize another person’s human rights work as, to paraphrase, ‘not the right kind,’ or ‘not enough’ or ‘convenient,’ is deeply insulting and offensive.” Where in my writing did I actually do this?
24. In this tweet, you said, “I speak about things I am passionate about. Things that have affected me personally.” Why do you need to have a personal experience with either an issue or an injustice in order to speak out about it?
25. You recently retweeted: “You can only watch injustice go on for so long until you’re compelled to say something. To speak out against it.” How long will you be watching the injustices caused by President Obama’s policies before speaking out against them?
Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Monday, July 29, 2013
12:17 a.m.