Greta (2019)

Neil Jordan’s Greta begins as a surprisingly dull drama before ultimately deteriorating into a laughable, maddening thriller.  For the Oscar-winning creator of The Crying Game, this is an embarrassing comedown, his worst film since High Spirits.

Chloe Grace Moritz plays Frances, a restaurant hostess mourning the loss of her mother.  Her academic father (Canadian Stratford Festival vet Colm Feore) has already moved on.  (In a deleted scene, a year after his wife’s death, he already has a new girlfriend.)  As a result, their once close relationship is now strained.  She dreads his phone calls and avoids returning them as much as possible.

During the opening titles, as she’s about to depart her subway car, she spots a leather purse left behind on a seat and grabs it.  When she approaches the lost and found, it’s closed, so she takes it home.  Her colonics-and-yoga-obsessed loft roommate Erica (Maika Monroe) dumps out the contents and isn’t impressed.  She also tries to steal the cash.

But Frances knows what she must do.

The purse belongs to a mysterious old woman named Greta (a phenomenally miscast Isabelle Huppert).  When Frances arrives at her suspiciously isolated home, she seems friendly enough.  But we know better than Frances.

In the very first shot of the film, as Greta leaves that same subway car, it’s blatantly obvious she left behind the purse on purpose.  (How come no one rushes to give it back to her?)  A vulnerable, naive Frances gets sucked right into Greta’s manipulative song-and-dance about her dead husband, her dead dog and her estranged daughter.  Longing for a replacement mother figure, she totally buys in.  Greta tests her loyalty.  Frances stupidly proclaims it.  “My friends call me chewing gum.  I tend to stick around.”  What a dope.

When Frances offers to help her find a new pet, Greta first demurs then later conveniently changes her mind.  At the pound, Greta settles on a sad looking pooch who’s on the verge of being put to sleep.  How she’s allowed to adopt it when the animal won’t even eat her treats and does nothing but whimper around her is beyond me.

Accepting a dinner invitation at her home, everything changes when Frances makes a hilarious discovery.  It’s hilarious because it’s so dumb.  That’s not a good hiding place.

Unable to hide her suddenly sickening feelings, Frances skips dessert and hightails it out of there.  This gives a concerned Greta an excuse to continually try to contact her.  This sudden change in the young woman’s attitude arouses deep suspicion.  There are dozens and dozens of phone calls that go mostly unreturned.  Then the stalking begins which provokes more laughter.  Look out the restaurant window and there’s Greta.  Walk off the apartment elevator and there’s Greta again.

Despite repeated attempts to tell her to fuck off without actually saying the words, Greta is unrelenting.  She won’t take no for an answer.  One such encounter sounds like a break-up that doesn’t take.

There are the usual, frustrating scenes where Frances is informed by the reliably useless authorities that Greta’s actions aren’t illegal and don’t meet the criteria for unlawful harassment which, of course, is total nonsense.  (A possible restraining order will take months to implement and therefore, never pursued.)  In one scene, she sends Frances photos of Erica she snaps while quietly following her around Brooklyn, occasionally reminding her through text messages of her “betrayal”.  Frances belatedly realizes she didn’t really need that phone tutorial after all.  The technologically proficient Greta is hooked on her Facebook page.  She loves being bored, apparently.

Most ridiculous of all is the scene where Greta returns to Frances’ restaurant expecting to be served.  The crazy old lady makes such a big scene she gets carried out and straitjacketed onto a gurney right into an ambulance.  But she’s immediately released from custody (Frances figures out as much when she calls for information that’s not freely given) and this silly nightmare continues.

Jordan, who directed and co-wrote the screenplay, surely knew he was making a predictable pile of trash so there’s a bizarre sequence where he tries to subvert our expectations and fails miserably.

Erica, the roommate, who initially warns Frances that Greta is oddly clingy, now gives her incredibly bad advice.  She instructs her worried friend to meet with her tormentor, tell her she’s going away for a while to work on herself but when she comes back, they’ll definitely see each other again, which is a big whopper even an imbecile could spot.

Greta is not an imbecile.  A professional bullshitter always sees right through a panicked amateur.

Before Frances has even packed, there’s the old lady puttering around in her apartment (how did she break in?) as the young woman suddenly feels dazed.  Dragged out of there and dumped into the back of a cab, they’re soon at Greta’s home with Erica close to completely passing out.

Then suddenly, she awakens and is back at the loft, as though nothing has happened.  As her dad arrives to pick her up for their impromptu vacation, she walks into the elevator and instead of stopping on the first floor, it keeps dropping.  Oh, and it also tries to squish her.

She awakens again, but this time, she’s locked in a toy chest at Greta’s place.  Come on.

Now realizing she’s been kidnapped, Frances’ dad turns to a private investigator (longtime Jordan collaborator Stephen Rea) for assistance.  As soon as he arrives at Greta’s, you know he’s a fucking goner.

The second Frances becomes Greta’s prisoner, the movie becomes a bad parody of Misery.  Like the much scarier Annie Wilkes, we learn she too was once a nurse who shouldn’t have been hired in the first place.  (We also discover she’s not really French (despite being played by a French actress) and there’s a very good reason her daughter never responds to her frequent cards and letters.)  You wonder why it’s taking so long for a young, healthy woman to break free from her elderly captor, especially when, in the beginning, she’s not tied up, just locked in that secret room behind the piano.  Look at all the objects at her disposal.  Maybe break that chair over Greta’s head instead.

Then a finger gets chopped off and a rolling pin becomes an effective weapon.  But instead of finishing the job, which would be smart and buy more time, someone decides to run for it, forgetting you need a key to get out the front door.  There’s a discovery in the basement and then it’s back to the secret room where there is no chance of a solitary escape.

By the time we reach the pitiful end, once again a glorious opportunity arises to finish this once and for all.  But no.  That would make too much sense.  One must always allow room for a possible sequel.

Greta was released by Focus Features, the faux indie arm of Universal Pictures.  It starts off rather slow and tedious before suddenly traversing down formula thriller avenue.  But it’s often not thrilling at all.  Isabelle Huppert is the absolute wrong actress to pull this off.  She’s just not terrifying, not in the slightest, even when she’s playing stern piano teacher.  It’s extremely hard to believe she has gotten away with this lonely old lady act for as long as she has.  (How come no one is looking for all her other victims?)  Plus, she’s sloppy.  Really sloppy.

Consider the scene with the private investigator.  If Stephen Rea’s character was more on the ball, he would immediately ask why she’s only wearing one glove.  He would also demand to know what’s with that constant noise behind the piano.  (Why didn’t she noise-proof the secret room?)  When Greta goes upstairs briefly, he takes too long to investigate.  Inevitably, he pays the price for his sluggishness.  Shouldn’t he have anticipated being attacked?  He waits until he’s nearly passed out before pulling out his piece.  Dick Cheney has better aim.

Chloe Grace Moritz is an appealing lead but her character is too dense to take seriously.  Huppert isn’t really charming enough in the early scenes to warrant such immediate affection.  And when her true nature is exposed, you’re not even remotely unsettled.  Maika Monroe, who plays the roommate, is too obnoxious and unfunny.  Stephen Rea was far more memorable in his Oscar-nominated turn in The Crying Game.  And as for Colm Feore, he’s clearly slumming here.  This ain’t Shakespeare.

But Greta is a tragedy all the same, just not the way the filmmakers intended.

Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, June 30, 2019
2:37 a.m.

Published in: on June 30, 2019 at 2:37 am  Comments (1)  

The Driller Killer (1979)

Thank God Abel Ferrera made Bad Lieutenant and Body Snatchers.  If The Driller Killer was his only credit, his career would not be remembered with much fondness or respect.

Released 40 years ago when he was a hungry guerilla filmmaker in New York, Ferrera the director also plays the title character (but curiously uses a pseudonym for his acting credit), a struggling, temperamental painter living with two women, one his girlfriend, the other her secret lover.

Living right underneath their surprisingly spacious apartment is the world’s shittiest punk band, The Roosters, led by the deeply untalented Tony Coca-Cola.  He can’t sing, they can’t play.  Yet, they still attract groupies and a small club following.  When Ferrera’s girlfriend claims with a straight face that they actually sound good on their album, he is dumbfounded and unconvinced.  One of their hooks is a blatant rip-off of Peter Gunn.  It’s still awful.

Ferrera has a psychotic streak that isn’t properly explained or even remotely credible, despite his frequent bitchiness.  He has some bizarre dream early on that’s supposed to foreshadow his inevitable rampage.  One night, while huddled around the TV with the ladies, an ad comes on for Porto Pack, a portable battery pack that allows you to use appliances and electrical tools without a cord for just $19.95.

Shortly thereafter, Ferrera buys one.  And then for some reason, he starts murdering random homeless people by drilling holes in their heads, hands, backs and chests with his power drill.  He has no legitimate beef with them.  There’s even a scene where he converses with one friendly, smiling street person while sketching his portrait.

As Ferrera continually complains about the godawful Roosters and their endless noise pollution, at no time does he contemplate taking them out.  When Tony Coca-Cola comes around to ask if he’ll paint his portrait, Ferrera obliges for a 500 dollar fee.  Not a single homeless guy ever bothers him.

In the meantime, Ferrera’s relationship with his girlfriend is deteriorating.  He has this giant buffalo painting that he really needs to sell.  (Her alimony from her still smitten ex-husband is the only way they’re staying barely afloat.)  She wonders not unreasonably when he’s ever going to finish it.  He snaps at her condescendingly, proclaiming only he knows what he’s doing and it gets finished when it gets finished.

His increasingly impatient gay art dealer, who ultimately dismisses the work once he sees it, refuses to give him any more advance money.  For a guy who contemplates a better life, Ferrera is curiously more interested in killing randoms than selling his work.  He’s in no hurry to be the next Warhol.  And the movie is far too invested in showcasing The Roosters.  Honestly, what more could they do to warrant Ferrera’s wrath?  He refuses to do us all a favour.

Besides its complete lack of genuine scares and incomprehensible plot, The Driller Killer also embraces casual misogyny and homophobia.  Pissed off after his buffalo piece is brutally rejected, Ferrera lures the art dealer back to his apartment by unsubtly suggesting sex is on the table.  Spoiler:  it’s not.  The way Ferrera treats his girlfriend it’s no wonder her ex is suddenly looking like a better option for her.  But what about her secret bisexual lover?  Guess it was just a fling and not serious.  Anyway, their love scene in the shower feels more gratuitous than essential to the confusing plot.  Besides, she ends up rolling around with Tony Coca-Cola.  As Costanza would say, she could do a hell of a lot better than him.

Perhaps the strangest scene is the first one.  Ferrera walks up to some muttering, bearded guy in a church, sits down next to him, slowly reaches out for his hand and then gets freaked out when the guy suddenly looks at him.  He barrels out of there in a hurry.  What was the point of that exactly?  Bearded guy apparently had Ferrera’s name and phone number on him, and the church put them in contact with each other.  But they don’t have any connection whatsoever.  They’re not related.  This was their first meeting.  Is this the beginning of Ferrera’s inexplicable animus towards the homeless?  Really weak.

And then there’s the ending.  Despondent over his now ex-girlfriend’s exit from his life, a now completely unhinged Ferrera decides to pay her an unexpected visit.  The moment builds up as she climbs into bed thinking her ex is under the covers (even though she was expecting to have tea after her shower).  Will he kill her or will she survive?  We’ll never know because instead, we get the end credits.  We’re left to imagine the actual ending, not that we ever cared that much in the first place.

“THIS FILM SHOULD BE PLAYED LOUD”, the film instructs right off the top.  Actually, in this particular case, the mute button is your friend.

Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, June 16, 2019
12:37 a.m.

Published in: on June 16, 2019 at 12:38 am  Comments (1)  

The Beast Within (1982)

It’s 1964.  A newlywed couple is traveling through Mississippi late at night when their car gets stuck.  The husband (Ronny Cox in a rare babyface role) instructs the wife (Bibi Besch) to stay inside with the doors locked while he runs back up the road to get a tow truck.

But, of course, the wife doesn’t listen.  The couple’s yappy dog wants to get out from the back seat.  So, out they come.  But then she loses sight of him.  Meanwhile, something is on the prowl.  And it’s hungry.

Once chained in the basement of some old house in the woods, this thing is now loose and ravenous.  The wife soon makes two horrifying discoveries, one that will dramatically change the future course of her life.

That’s the set-up for The Beast Within, a truly terrible horror film that’s equal parts silly and tasteless.  In other words, a typical 1982 release.

Seventeen years later, we learn the married couple has a teenage son (an overwrought Paul Clemens) and he’s not doing too well.  Something to do with his pituitary gland, according to the doctor (R.G. Armstrong).  The kid keeps having sweaty, unscary nightmares about that old house where that mysterious thing was held prisoner.

Sure enough, he inevitably escapes the hospital and locates that same house.  Against his better judgment he opens up the locked cellar door and his heel turn begins.

What’s strange about The Beast Within is that because there’s lots of full moon shots we think we’re gonna see a werewolf movie.  But instead, we get a possession movie.  The boy is a catalyst for a pissed off spirit seeking vengeance against an entire family in a small Mississippi town.  One by one, the married couple’s son tracks them down and either eats them or stabs them.  These are not well-executed scenes, if you’ll forgive the pun.

Meanwhile, his idiotic parents belatedly start investigating what happened that fateful night in 1964.  The wife learns about a murder while rifling through the archives of the local newspaper that apparently has just one employee.  Some of the residents, including the mayor and the judge, are deeply concerned about their sudden investigation.  This is the worst cover-up since Watergate.

The tortured teenage son develops a crush on a cute local girl (Katherine Moffat) with an abusive dad (John Dennis Johnston).  There’s an odd scene where he hears a high-pitched noise and is in excruciating pain so he falls to his knees.  Then, they make out on the ground.  Killing the mood is her dog who runs over to drop off a severed hand he just dug up.  The police eventually recover 36 skeletons in the same wooded area, only one of which is identified.

In the meantime, the killings continue.  There’s the coroner who looks like an even creepier Conan O’Brien.  And the “crazy” old drunk, an old friend of the vengeful spirit, who no one believes is telling the truth about the teenage son.  (Why he gets electrocuted to death makes no sense.  He didn’t wrong anybody.)  By the time everybody finally stops being stupid, the son has transformed into some kind of monster ready to relive 1964.

Let’s focus on that transformation scene for a moment.  Now I’m a sucker for old-school effects that are done well.  Look at what David Cronenberg’s team put together in Scanners and Videodrome which were released during the same period.  Those effects and the make-up hold up really well.  Compare all of that with The Beast Within and you’ll notice one major difference.  These scenes provoke unintentional laughter.

Why does the teenage son look like a generic deformed monster when this vengeful spirit that’s inhabiting his mind and body is supposed to be an ordinary human being?  And what’s with the sexual assaults?  Does the spirit only have a limited amount of time in a certain body?  Is that why he has to procreate?

The movie comes full circle in its final scene essentially repeating what we witness in the opening.  At no point during this movie does anyone mention the word “abortion”.

Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, June 16, 2019
12:19 a.m.

Published in: on June 16, 2019 at 12:19 am  Comments (2)  

Haven’t Felt In Years

Numbing agents at my disposal
All I need is a single dose
No forthcoming counter proposal
Far away and yet so close

A stinging sensation, then a hint of bliss
A permanent chemical solution
A thrust of denial works like this
A perfect shot of delusion

Hammer the nail until it breaks the flesh
Target the pain for removal
Pound it hard while the wounds still fresh
This always meets my approval

Protect yourself from further decay
Keep stabbing at the ghosts of the past
Even though they refuse to go away
This valley of depression is vast

Dreading the impact of the final blow
Arrival uncertain and the source of all fears
When it finally comes, I won’t even know
I haven’t felt in years

Dennis Earl
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Sunday, June 9, 2019
3:19 a.m.

Published in: on June 9, 2019 at 3:19 am  Comments (1)